ARCHIVES
VOL. 2, ISSUE 1 (2026)
From courtroom to newsroom: the impact of media narratives on Supreme Court judgments
Authors
Aparna
Abstract
The interaction between the judiciary and the media has gained
significant importance in modern democratic societies, where Supreme Court
judgments are rapidly transformed into news narratives that shape public
opinion. As court decisions move from the courtroom to the newsroom, media
outlets play a crucial role in interpreting, simplifying, and framing complex
legal issues for the public. While such coverage enhances transparency and
public awareness of constitutional matters, it can also influence how judicial
authority and legitimacy are perceived. Media narratives often emphasize
conflict, personalities, or political implications, which may overshadow
nuanced legal reasoning and constitutional principles underlying Supreme Court
judgments. This research paper deals with the evolving influence of media
narratives on Supreme Court judgments and their broader implications for public
perception, judicial independence, and democratic discourse. The growing
prominence of media discourse raises concerns about the balance between freedom
of the press and respect for judicial autonomy. Understanding how media
narratives shape public engagement with Supreme Court decisions is essential
for preserving informed democratic debate and maintaining trust in both judicial
institutions and the media.
Download
Pages:50-54
How to cite this article:
Aparna "From courtroom to newsroom: the impact of media narratives on Supreme Court judgments". International Journal of Research in All Subject, Vol 2, Issue 1, 2026, Pages 50-54
Download Author Certificate
Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.